Dr. Majid Ali's archive: what was preserved, and how this site uses it

ProperHealth's research archives rest on three bodies of material: public-health sources, the PIMA clinic's own documents, and the writing of a physician-author who published as Majid Ali MD, whose websites, columns and videos Clarkson Pharmacy preserved in September 2026. This page explains what that archive is, what the site does with it, and what it deliberately does not do.

What was preserved

The first capture, on 1 September 2026, took three WordPress sites plus the Townsend Letter, with manifest, failure queue and media.¹ A second pass three weeks later re-checked those sites and added 3 Majid Ali sites that had not been captured: alisciencedotorg, kidskirto and drali2 (756 records).² His own-channel videos that were publicly downloadable were saved at up to 480p.³ Originals are never edited; every later step works from copies, and each copy carries a checksum.

What the labels mean

The archive index sorts records by topic and by risk. Those labels come from keyword matching, not clinical review,⁴ so they tell a reader where a record sits, not whether its claims hold. A record labelled "cancer" or "detox" is a record that uses those words.

The rule that protects the clinical pages

Six subjects are readable by staff as labelled historical material and never shown to patients: peroxide/oxidant therapy, chelation, cancer, detox, medication replacement, and disease reversal/cure.⁵ The treatment-modality readings on this site — ozone, hydrogen peroxide, chelation, chlorine dioxide and the rest — are ProperHealth's own evidence-graded pages, written from regulators and public-health sources, not from the archive. Where the archive discusses those subjects, the reading stands beside it as the independent view.

Where a condition page carries a historical perspective from Dr. Ali's writing, it cites the exact record and lists the claims it does not carry. Every health claim in the patient preview is traced⁶ to a passage in a saved snapshot, and the build fails when a passage cannot be found.

What has not happened

No approval record exists for any earlier Majid content⁷ — the word "approved" inside older generated files is only a claim, and the site treats it as one. The reader that holds the full collection stays behind the staff sign-in until each part has been reviewed; the public collection page lists the cited records in his own words.

How to read him

His essays are shown as history, not as current medical guidance. Where they agree with today's public-health sources, the condition pages say so with the source beside them; where they do not, the claim stays in the archive, labelled, and the independent reading stands next to it.